With the early departure of the U.S. delegation and controversy over discussion of slavery and the Middle East, was the recent U.N. conference on racism a failure? I prefer to see those who are frustrated and justifiably angered by their predicament engaged in rhetoric rather than violence. I wish the United States had remained engaged. We had an opportunity to help shape the final declaration. Even in our absence, the South Africans and others willing to lead the search for common ground took the conference light-years ahead of where it began. I believe that the highly respected Colin Powell could have taken it even further. This was an opportunity to talk sense about reconciliation and reparation, to shift the conver-sation away from individual compensation to assisted self-reliance and participatory development. The legacy of slavery and segregation, the intentional underdevelopment of a people, is all around us. We ignore it at our peril. Was the conference a failure? Absolutely not. We have the beginnings of a global antiracism movement where it belongs—with the institutions of civil society. Let us not forget the role that civil-society groups played in the collapse of Communism, the fall of the Berlin Wall, and the ending of apartheid. Governments will only address the issues of racism, racial discrimination, and related intolerance if the people demand it. Durban may have been the beginning of a global demand. |
Share your comments
Have an account?
Sign in to commentNo Account?
Email the editor